Studying the impact of innovation on business and society

Dear Chris Anderson, an Open Letter to Make Things Right

Chris Anderson, Editor in Chief of Wired and also author of The Long Tail, is someone whom I deeply admire and respect. We’ve linked to each other in the past and for the most part, I agree with his views and observations.

Every now and then Anderson discusses the state of PR and when he does, it causes nothing less than a full-blown blogstorm that reverberates across the entire industry. But, what matters is that we all learn from it.

In his latest post, he makes a pretty powerful statement, “Sorry PR people, you’re blocked.”

If you don’t read anything else in my post, please just learn from what Chris says here, “So fair warning: I only want two kinds of email: those from people I know, and those from people who have taken the time to find out what I’m interested in and composed a note meant to appeal to that.”

Is that so hard?


What’s it going to take for PR to reflect that sentiment and honest plea for relevance?

It should be common sense. But it’s not. Common sense is all too uncommon in almost everything we do these days. I really wasn’t going to blog about this as there have been plenty of very astute, as well as unbelievably lame, commentary on the subject.

Taking a step back to observe the landscape, the cumulative response represents both sides of the spectrum and everything in between. The net result should be that we as PR people need to do things better.

So, where do I fit in?

As both a PR person and a blogger, and as a friend to many people currently discussing it online, I felt a bit like Al Pacino in Godfather Part III…every time I think I’m out, they draaaaaggg me back in!

First, let me say this, more for Chris, but to the benefit of everyone else as well, I agree and empathize with the inspiration behind your post.

No, really, I do.

Hell, I only get a small fraction of the press releases and pitches you receive, but it’s still enough to give me a taste of your frustration. I’m committed to helping rectify this problem for you and all other respectable and influential journalists and bloggers.

Let’s reach an accord shall we?

I promise to fix this problem among those with whom I work with and can reach. I will also work with others whose voices are trusted among PR practitioners and their peers within the communities in which they seek guidance. We will do everything we can to help teach those PR people who truly desire to learn and truly understand the ramifications of their actions, good and bad, and how to be successful while respecting the rules.

Everyone else, aka the lazy PR flacks, well, they’re are on their own.

What do I ask in return?

Remove the list of names from your blog. Keep them in your block list, but let’s not continue to publicly crush the hopes of those who really were only, at the end of the day, doing their job – no matter how poorly it was done.

Yes, I know and appreciate that you wouldn’t have drawn the same worldwide reaction had you not posted them. The deed is done and cheers to you for taking a stand.

I feel the lazy flacks have learned their lesson as they have all been alerted to the fact that they are the epitome of what’s wrong with PR; well, that, and the fact that your post scared the sh!t out of everyone else.

Yes, they represent the larger epidemic of what we the few, but proud PR folks who try to do things better, have to contend with day in and day out – the worldwide poor reputation of PR. Public Relations, when you think about it, really is the furthest thing from PR these days. I mean honestly, very few of us are out there building relationships with the public or people for that matter. Most of us don’t bother to spend the time to really learn about what we represent, why it matters, and how it’s different than everything else out there. And, without that understanding how could we possibly figure out the channels and context necessary for it to reach the people that would need to hear the story?

This is the reason why many PR people aren’t or will never be, ready to make the transition to Social Media. After all, if reporters and bloggers don’t want to talk to us, why would we bring the same foolish BS and spam tactics to our customers?

I dedicate this blog and almost everything that I do to try to change things for the better. But I am only one person. I join a growing group of people who really do want to change, build relationships, and be of service to you, our customers, as well as to the people who employ us.

But it’s not just PR. It’s the whole game of media. And, the game itself is broken.

The only reason anyone is paying attention now is because Social Media provides the ability for people to to reach other people on a global and immediate scale, and in this case it just may start to work itself from the right to the left on any market graph. People have voices now and they can now publicize and expose the very things we took for granted for far too long.

Let’s look at the game however, because PR is only one of many functions in the greater scheme of content distribution.

It is a job that many people perform everyday in order to earn a living. Like any business, there are shining stars and lazy flacks that ruin it for everyone else. But, it is still a job. and people are still just people. We all have a$$hole bosses or clients that push and push us in order to prove our value and earn our paychecks regardless of how much we push back. In many cases, like in everything else, most just grin and bear it. We also have coworkers that are just in this to collect a paycheck. Even though the timer is ticking until they leave the business, their contribution only damages the damaged PR reputation in the meantime.

Many of us are measured in volume, inbound links, traffic, sales, or by the stack of coverage, that all collectively determines our ability to keep our jobs. Don’t get me wrong. There are plenty of snake oil s
alesman in
this business, and in every business for that matter, but those who truly want to do things differently choose to separate themselves from the crowd.

There are those that are overly ambitious and just don’t know better. Then there are those who are trained by decades of outdated communications philosophies, formulas and bullsh!t metrics that send them out into the real world only to get baptized by fire for every mistake they make – while taking down the brand they represent in the process. And in the realm of Social Media, these lessons are the equivalent of public flogging in the town square, except this time, the world is watching.

There have been many responses to this subject, however, what every single one of them is missing is that sense of internalization that demonstrates that “we” get it. Maybe most don’t believe that some of us could get it, but boy, do we get it. Then again, how does everyone else know we really get it?

I can guarantee you that I will still get my scheduled call from Bacons aka MediaMap offering to renew my unbelievably expensive subscription to the “industry-leading” media database, that, as they SWEAR, provides me with every opt-in contact who wants to receive information associated with key topics, products and industries.

But, it’s the difference between building lists and building relationships.

Could we do our job better?

Hell yes.

Could we take the time to make sure that what we want to share is actually important to you?

Yes. Absolutely.

Should we spend more time reaching out to people individually than blasting matrices comprised of those who are simply grouped by “key words?”

Yeah. I mean, it should be obvious. But most PR people, veterans included, are just groomed to make the numbers. But, yes, yes we really need to adopt and live the “less is more” and “quality versus quantity” mantras we hear all the time. More importantly, we need to also push back and ensure that our clients and bosses understand what the collective group of fed-up journalists and bloggers are saying that they will no longer tolerate the status quo.

It’s all about humanizing not just the process of receiving information, but also the process of sending it.

Is PR representative of spam?

For the most part, yes.

This is business and every cog in the machine has its associated benefits and downsides. For every reporter and blogger that’s inundated with lame pitches and unsolicited press releases, I can show you two flacks that are equally spammed with requests for updates and the status of coverage from execs in order to prove their worth. The problem is so much deeper than PR spam. It goes back to the very reason why companies invest in PR in the first place, and in the process, they mostly miss the point of publicity all together. They all believe their news matters to everyone else and that you have nothing better to do than take our release and run with it.

Get me the Wall Street Journal!

Why aren’t we in the New York Times?

You do have these relationships right?

But, let’s put things in perspective. There’s more to the story.

Media is also a business and they are comprised of both editorial and advertising departments. Do you know how many phone calls and emails I get from sales or biz dev people from publications and blogs soliciting advertising “deals” and sponsorship opportunities for conferences? You’d be surprised and I’m not the only one.

In some cases, I’ll receive calls only moments after speaking with a reporter saying, “I hear so and so is considering running your company in the story on such and such. I think it would be smart to also take out an ad to strengthen your story and your brand.”

I’ve even had some reporters tell us off the record that they were advised not to cover us until certain contracts were signed.

Ahh yes, this is all a business. Most editors and reporters however, have the luxury of not seeing this side of things. It’s not hypocrisy. In most cases it really is just church and state, but just not equally on both sides of the playing field.

Do any of these sales people take the time to figure out that I’m merely in PR and not in sales?

For the most part, I’d wager that these ad sales people are more aggressive and relentless than PR could ever be.

While reporters complain of those PR people who follow up and ask, “Did you get my email?” There are also sales people who call daily to CONVINCE me that I’m making a terrible mistake by not running ads when my competitors are all participating.

Yes, it’s the difference between commission and fixed salary – it’s all related to the ability to sell a story vs. tell a story.

Like anything there are lines and they’re crossed all the time, across the board.

But for every crappy PR person and ad rep, there are also equally lazy writers.

Trust me when I say though, that there are plenty of reporters and bloggers who can’t get the story right, even if they’re briefed, which has legitimate business ramifications. There are lazy reporters who simply cut and paste and can’t be bothered to do more. There are writers who won’t cover a story because someone else did, even though their ad departments can “prove” that their demographics have little crossover with any of their competition. There are those who break embargoes for the sake of getting the extra eyeballs for that particular story. And then there are those who are better than everyone else. These actions too come at a price.

Would publicly outing these people make things better?

I don’t think so. Is PR constantly sending offers for penis enlargement miracles or the ability to meet lonely women in your area tonight?


So, just opt out. It’s part of the business.

It’s the difference between spam and someone just doing their job – again, even though it’s a poor way of doing so.

It’s just as easy to reply to someone with either unsubscribe or “f#ck off” as it is to place them on a blog post where they, and their company can be ridiculed.

Block them and publish the companies like Gina Trapani did (whom I also greatly admire.)

We all choose who we ultimately work with and we earn the relationships we deserve. But at the end of the day, the onus is on PR leaders to do something about it – at least from our side any way.

Chris Anderson didn’t tell us anything we didn’t already know. He only brought a bigger magnifying glass to class in order for us to more effectively see the ills of our business. We still have things we need to change and until we do, these public lists are only going to increase in frequency and volume.

Attention PR people, here are your lifehacks or PR hacks in order for you to do your job better and stop pissing people off ( and ruining it for the rest of us in the process).

1. Remember this is about people

2. What do you stand for? Answer that first before you try to convince people that are busier than you why they should take time to stop what they’re doing to pay you any attention.

3. It’s more than doing your homework. To some doing homework is building lists. Figure out what your are representing and why it matters. How does it compare to other things. What do people need? What are their pains?

4. Practice saying it aloud in one-to-two minutes or less to a friend or in front of a mirror. Seriously. It works. If you don’t get it no one else will.

5. Less is more. Find the right people, not just because you read their profile in a database, but because you read their work and understand their perspective.

6. Engage in conversations outside of when you need something.

7. Build relationships not lists.

8. Humanize the process and remember that this is about people

9. Stop whining and making excuses. You are responsible for your actions so arm yourself with what you need to be successful.

10. Isn’t weird that it’s always 10? Stop sending press releases without summarizing what the news is and why it is IMPORTANT to the individual person you’re sending it to.

11. Ah, thank you Spinal Tap. This one goes to 11. Remember the future of PR is on you. If you’re not in this to do your job better, then ask yourself why you’re here. If you’re not actively contributing to things improving then you’re part of the problem.

Other voices on the subject (all of whom I felt had something relevant to contribute to the discussion):

Jeremy Zawodny
Commercial Archive
PR. Differently
Common Sense PR
Bad Pitch Blog
Jeremy Pepper
Cartoon Barry Blog
Marketing Begins at Home

Murphy’s Law
Web Ink Now
The Flack
C.C. Chapman

An Alternative Perspective
Shel Holtz
Joshua Schachter
Topaz Partners
How to Split an Atom
Behind the Buzz
Ryan Block
Geoff Livingston

UPDATE: Chris Anderson follows up his original post by surveying the aftermath. He also had a few nice things to say in response to a comment about my post. Thank you Chris, I appreciate it. “Brian’s a smart guy and the bits I read seems spot on…”

Connect with me on Twitter, Jaiku, Pownce or Facebook.

12 COMMENTS ON THIS POST To “Dear Chris Anderson, an Open Letter to Make Things Right”

  1. Mich says:

    I’ve read many posts, and for the majority to congratulate him on a job well done–well, that’s an ethical issue, I think; as well as privacy. At the end of the day, do Chris’ actions teach journalists and public relations practitioners where to draw the line, or how to do their jobs better? Not at all. It says, “Ridicule works best, kids!” – signed, Editor-in-Chief.

    Bottom line: To either rely on compiled media lists or to expect expert pitches are both veiled suggestions of, “I’m too good for this.” To that, I say, okay. I canceled my subscription to Wired after reading his post, and I sent my pitch to his publisher. I can get the news and features elsewhere.

    At the end of the day, it’s the ego that pisses me off. No one in this game has the market cornered on social media and communications, period.

  2. Michael Tangeman @ media mindshare says:

    Well-reasoned post, Brian, though the fact that you posted at 4:17 am (assuming your clock is correct) shows in the length of the post … and I must confess, I didn’t have time to read through it all.

    Which brings me to the point of my comment … time. The lack of it. For everyone, including all my former journo colleagues who have their backs against the wall and don’t respond to emails (selectively, carefully directed to them according to their beats) and/or who use voice-mail to screen all incoming calls.

    And, time … the lack of it, for all those PR account executives driven to produce the same results (placements, god I hate that word) in an-ever shrinking traditional media universe. Sure, there are the lazy ones who just spam, always will be. And I won’t let them off the hook — or let myself off the hook from the times that I’ve sent out the odd blast — by saying they’re driven to it by a lack of time in the face of an ever more difficult task of securing, er, coverage for their clients’ news. But, certainly, time and a shrinking media universe tempt them/us to use the odd blast when faced with a deadline and the need to produce results.

    Ultimately, and here’s the irony, I think, it’s the technology we all love and tout and work with to our advantage every day that’s also driving us bonkers, journalists and PR folk alike, helping to speed up our deadlines, cut our margins and encouraging us to behave in ways that normally civilized individuals might think twice about.

    Like spamming … or like publishing a list of all the spammers. Shame on PR as a profession for doing way too much spamming of releases, but shame on Chris as well for going to the extreme of outing the perpetrators. Since he had to open those emails to see what was in them, he might have just had a macro-keyed insert warning response letting them know they were being deep-sixed and their email address banned. Even threatening a public outing if they didn’t desist.

    An easy, common-sense approach that would have resolved the situation, though perhaps not quite so anger-quenching or ego-satisfying as a good old-fashioned public outing in the blogosphere town square.

    And, speaking of time, look how long this comment of mine has been … and it’s not even 4 in the morning!

  3. Rich says:


    I really appreciated your authenticity on the subject.

    We were discussing some of your ideas at lunch on how to get back what e-mailed news releases took away (the subject for yet another post). I think the best advice for most public relations is to get back to the basics…

    Number of placements was never what public relations was really supposed to be about. That is probably the number one misconception that tied the hands of public relations professionals. Break that measure and the rest will follow.

    At least, that is what I think.


  4. onlineprguy says:

    I agreed in principle with Anderson, Brian.

    It keeps us on our toes and reminds us the Net is the great equalizer.

    I did write Chris and tell him many of us were actually taught in school to first pitch editors, as it’s their job to assign stories to their teams.

    So I agree with you: Many who were outed were likely just doing their jobs as directed, and instructed.

    Still, it’s Anderson’s right to use the Net and express frustration, as we continue to (hopefully)use the Net to best do our jobs.

  5. David says:

    Brian, thanks for a thoughtful commentary on the subject. I’ve written about this a few times as well. But I must respectfully disagree with your position on removing the names from The Long Tail. In fact, I’ve recommended that bloggers contact the clients of PR “pro’s” who get this wrong just to let them know how bad a job we’re doing.

    Bottom line: irrelevant pitching has to stop. The list at the Long Tail, as extensive as it is, is only a fraction of the problem. And it’s not going to stop unless there’s an appropriate deterrent.

    Maybe it’s easy for me since my email isn’t on that list. Nobody from my company made that list. I’d like to think it’s because we take the time to do it right, and we take efforts to be relevant and respectful. Maybe it’s just because we knew not to send irrelevant emails to Chris there.

    When you’re in PR and you’re pitching, you’re sending a communication that is intended to enter the public domain. You can’t be shocked if someone publishes your email address or message verbatim. Don’t like it? You’re in the wrong business.

    As for those who complain that they have resource restraints coupled with demanding clients, you need to manage client expectations better. You have to spend some time teaching. And that might mean you don’t do as much of this work. So be it.

    One final thing – it seems to me that people are treating this list as if it were some kind of death sentence. It’s not. It means that the people on this list made a mistake, and this one time they got burned. It doesn’t mean their careers in social media are over. Hopefully all it means is they won’t do this again.

    Maybe Chris has a HUGE ego – but so what? He’s the guy you want to pitch, you have to manage that. He’s not the first and won’t be the last.

  6. lisa says:


    Thank you for stirring the pot, and for your frank insight on this topic.
    You’ve had my subscribe for a long time now.
    One question, did you create those LOL cats, or are you friends with icanhazcheeseburger? 🙂
    Either way, they’re great.


  7. Chris Heuer says:

    I still don’t understand why some of the most basic tennets of communications are not understood more widely? Or perhaps more pointedly, why so many ‘professionals’ are too lazy to get to know the people they are trying to talk to. I understand how many organizations are understaffed and overworked, which creates a ripe condition for such a situation to emerge, but there is no longer any legitimate excuses for people who are engaged in such practices.

    Very glad to see real professionals, like my friend Brian, holding up the light to help guide other PR practitioners – great post…

  8. Stacey says:

    I appreciate that you acknowledged this issue as a fundamental problem of the media industry, not just of PR “flacks.” With the amount of spam in our email boxes, print media and even on television, I agree, “the [media] game is broken.” We’ve stopped communicating and instead, just throw truckloads of information at each other hoping something will hit the other person in the face with enough force for it to grab their attention.

    It is time to scale back and to consider quality message design in all aspects of communication, be it a press release or an entire campaign. Like you said, we need to “build relationships, not lists” and “humanize the process.”

    As stated above, an important point to take away from this incident is the need to re-evaluate how we measure success in the public relations industry. It should not be about the number of placements. I agree with Rich: we need to get back to the basics.

  9. mezamashii says:

    amen! Great blog.

  10. Reid Wegley says:

    Awesome perspective Brian! I am late in commenting to your post, but not because I’m a lazy flack. Your post actually inspired me to write something too, from a little different perspective.

    I’d love your comments on my blog, if you have time and interest. You can find it here:

    I respect Anderson’s story, but not so much the man himself from past dealings with him.

    PR firms need to wake up.

  11. bestpenisenlargement says:

    I am Very thank full the owner of this blog. Because of this blog is very imformative for me, – Best Penis Enlargement – We list and review the Top Penis Enlargement in market

  12. Post very nicely written, and it contains useful facts. I am happy to find your distinguished way of writing the post. Now you make it easy for me to understand and implement. Thanks for sharing with us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Our Mailing List

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Stay Connected