Studying the impact of innovation on business and society

The Decline of Newspaper Revenue and the Promise of the Human Network

It’s not news that newspaper revenue derived from advertising and subscriptions is rapidly eroding. While Madison Avenue worries about the recession and its impact on advertising in general, numbers recently published by the Newspaper Association of America indicate online advertising only continues to rise.

Perhaps most interesting is the impending intersection between the decline of a 200 year old institution and a new medium competing for the same precious ad dollars for only the last 15 years. According to this chart, the collision could occur as soon as the end of next year.

The fate of newspapers, and journalism, is tied to the publisher’s adeptness and mastery to reinvent the model for the creation, distribution, and promotion of information as it identifies and connects to the shift in social consumption. Content must migrate to the individual attention dashboard in order to trigger a reaction and reverberate across the social graph, and in turn, lead viewers, friends, and friends of friends back to the source of information.

It’s a value cycle that warrants ongoing sustenance in order to build a thriving community. It also injects a new formula that humanizes content and lays a foundation for contextual relationship building (online and in real life), linking the people who write to the people who read, share and respond, where they congregate online.

The human network can help traditional media effectively adapt to the social Web.

Tracking the Newspaper Fallout:
Paper Cuts
Brian McDaniel, “Will Online Ad REvenue Beat Newspapers in 2011?”

Connect with me on:
Twitter, FriendFeed, LinkedIn, Tumblr, Plaxo, Plurk,, BackType, Social Median, or Facebook

Now available:

10 COMMENTS ON THIS POST To “The Decline of Newspaper Revenue and the Promise of the Human Network”

  1. Aimee Greeblemonkey says:

    Another great post.

  2. Brian Solis says:

    Thank you Aimee!

  3. Ken Leebow says:

    Your explanation is the beginning of a great article/explanation of what is happening. One that I have never seen articulated.

    Expand please . . .

  4. BrianMcDaniel says:


    Could you please point to the source of your online revenue?

    When I went to the NAA website and looked at the “advertising expenditure” nmbers under “trends and numbers,” their online revenues were nowhere close to the numbers you have in your chart.

    The online numbers range from $1,216 in 2003 to $3,109 in 2008. While newspapers ranged from $44,939 to $34,740 in the same period.

    If I am looking at the right numbers, online revenue wont intersect for quite some time. My regression line suggests it’s closer to 4Q2010 when revenues intersect, but I don’t expect newspaper revnues to fall as dramatically as my Quadratic Regression predicts.


    Brian McDaniel

  5. jessica.vanwinkle181 says:

    The newspaper business needs to adapt or it won’t exist in a few years. I hope that they are able to survive. While I love social networking sites, I still enjoying reading newspapers. I do read newspapers in print, specifically the Herald-Leader and the New York Times. I like sitting down and spending time by myself reading. I know several people my age that still read the print newspaper. I know that most newspapers are already online, but there’s just something about a newspaper in print that I like. I hope that newspapers are able to adjust and continue to print; it would be a shame to have all newspapers online.

  6. Great post it is a case of old media vs new media. I believe both the TV and radio would be showing similar results.

  7. Great post it is a case of old media vs new media. I believe both the TV and radio would be showing similar results.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Our Mailing List

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Stay Connected